<$BlogRSDUrl$>
 

zigzackly's omnium-gatherum *

Quid quid latine dictum sit, altum videtur

Reactions, suggestions, any kind of feedback is always welcome.

Recent Posts
The Chennai floods
First, Google Analytics. Now, Diagnostics and Inve...
What nonsense. We pray to Technorati.
Call us Zigbert
To the table staff at Barista, Cafe Coffee Day, Mo...
bloggers and the MSM
Five non-Bloggers
DD
Duckt tape
zigzackly

D Mervin Ffingir writes, and having writ, moves on:
September 2003 | December 2003 | January 2004 | February 2004 | March 2004 | April 2004 | May 2004 | June 2004 | July 2004 | August 2004 | September 2004 | October 2004 | November 2004 | December 2004 | January 2005 | February 2005 | March 2005 | April 2005 | May 2005 | June 2005 | July 2005 | August 2005 | September 2005 | October 2005 | November 2005 | December 2005 | January 2006 | February 2006 | March 2006 | April 2006 | May 2006 | June 2006 | July 2006 | August 2006 | September 2006 | October 2006 | November 2006 | December 2006 | January 2007 | February 2007 | March 2007 | April 2007 | May 2007 | June 2007 | July 2007 | August 2007 | September 2007 | October 2007 | November 2007 | December 2007 | January 2008 | February 2008 | March 2008 | April 2008 | May 2008 | June 2008 | July 2008 | August 2008 | November 2008 | December 2008 | January 2009 | March 2009 | April 2009 | May 2009 | June 2009 | July 2009 | August 2009 | September 2009 | November 2009 | December 2009 | January 2010 | February 2010 | March 2010 | June 2010 | July 2010 | August 2010 | October 2010 | November 2010 | December 2010 | January 2011 | February 2011 | March 2011 | April 2011 | May 2011 | August 2011 | September 2011 | December 2011 | February 2012 | March 2012 | August 2012 | December 2012 | April 2013 | August 2013 | November 2013 | April 2014 | July 2014 | August 2014 | December 2014 | February 2015 | May 2015 | June 2015 | July 2015 | August 2015 | September 2015 | November 2015 | April 2016 | July 2016 |



Sunday, December 04, 2005
Bad Mid-Day? 

Now, we don't think we're a prude - we're usually accused of being way too liberal - but we were more than a little scandalised to see in today's Sunday Mid Day a double spread feature on the Bad Sex Award. Not just a short mention (which would be okay, IOAO, considering there was an Indian angle with Aniruddha Bahal taking it two years ago, and Salman Rushdie and Tarun Tejpal on this year's shortlist), but, erm, extracts. Not just this year's winner, but the winners all the way from '94. Plus, in a mild attack of originality, an add-on feature on Bad and Good Sex in the Indian film industry.

And yes, we know the Lit blog world has covered this, and that's in the public eye too, but there seems to be a line being crossed here.

A newspaper lands up in our homes, has puzzles for the brats, etcetera. Are you comfortable with the kiddos finishing the Jumble and then turning to a page of rather descriptive text, even if a few perfectly normal body-part type words are *******ed out?
Cross-posted on we, the media.

Blogged for thee by @ 10:23 pm | 8 Comments | Post a Comment | Link Love? |



8 Noble Readers have commented.

  On Monday, 5 December 2005 at 00:26:00 GMT+5:30, the Hon'ble Blogger amit varma said...

Good post, Peter. My take on it is here.

  On Monday, 5 December 2005 at 07:14:00 GMT+5:30, the Hon'ble Blogger √úbermaniam said...

My tke on it is here. I think it's okay to bring it out in the open. Considering how much sex we have in the mind. We'll get used to it. We'll survive. We're the people who used to blanch at all kinds of things that we now accept as given. Similarly, so will bad sex. God knows, it's a given in most marriages. Cheers and much pestilence from the daily pest. And you really must stop letting people use your comments space as an advertising space to their own posts. Considering how selfish people are about comments on their own sites. ;-)

  On Monday, 5 December 2005 at 10:34:00 GMT+5:30, the Hon'ble Blogger madhavan said...

Perfectly comfortable. Though I have no kids. Also, if uncomfortable stop subscription. There are no lines in free markets, only choices

  On Monday, 5 December 2005 at 23:08:00 GMT+5:30, the Hon'ble Anonymous ?! said...

I find it amazing how every one jumps to the defence of tastelessness. Hullo ? Ain't asking for muzzling freedom of expression or what not. All the gent is asking for is to show the newspaper readers the same courtesies shown by say, a movie channel which says "pg 13" or something like that.

So we are to let "market forces rule", huh ? Theory, theory. A guy subscribes to a paper, he finds a cheap article pandering to baser tastes. Oh no, do not write a letter to editor or rant on a blog. Tell yourself " Market forces will eventually drive him down. market forces ..."

Get a grip, people. To use an old line, Sunday Mid Day's article is as much about literary freedom or laissez faire as the missionary position is about missionaries.

  On Monday, 5 December 2005 at 23:32:00 GMT+5:30, the Hon'ble Blogger J. Alfred Prufrock said...

The article is all about using sex to sell. So sex sells. Big deal.

But yes, I agree that there should be some clear labelling to show which sections of the paper are PG13.

On the other hand, I was reading Victorian porn at the age of 10 (as I have mentioned in one post). I don't think I'm a sexual pervert (yet. I still nurture hopes!) because of the exposure.

J.A.P.

  On Tuesday, 6 December 2005 at 14:43:00 GMT+5:30, the Hon'ble Blogger madhavan said...

?!

A guy subscribes to paper, finds cheap article pandering to baser tastes, do write letter to editor, do rant on blog, do not buy paper next time. Dont say close that newspaper down, that newspaper should put this and not that.

And by the way who will decided baser and finer tastes - you.

And who will decide whether an article is cheap or not - you

And who will decide whether said cheap article as decided by you caters to said base tastes as decided by you - you

And why you? Why not me

  On Thursday, 8 December 2005 at 07:57:00 GMT+5:30, the Hon'ble Anonymous ?! said...

madhavan

It's not a matter of taste. Plenty of areas where legality is not in doubt, ethics are. That is why we have Ethics Councils, Ombudsmen, honor codes and other means of ensuring adherence to a general ( not necessarily all-consenting) standard.

  On Friday, 9 December 2005 at 16:51:00 GMT+5:30, the Hon'ble Anonymous shiv shankar said...

Peter: one question here is why msut kids not read sex, or se porn? How do porn writing and visuals affect children negatively?

Post a Comment

Kind souls who have linked to this post include:

Create a Link

< < Home < <




Note: [*] = The site linked to requires registration.

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons License.