zigzackly

Thursday, April 06, 2006

In which we show restraint on the post tit le.

BoingBoing prints this letter from Bennett Haselton, founder of Peacefire, about the FCC's ludicrous decision to issue a fine for the incident that gave us the term "wardrobe malfunction" two years ago:

I usually don't send out pure opinion pieces, but let it be said: There is not one person anywhere who can give you a good reason why it's OK to show a man's chest on TV, but not a woman's chest. You can ask over 100 people why -- trust me, I have -- and not get a real answer. It's just a silly superstition that some people came up with, a bunch of others went along with it, and now we're stuck with it. Have you ever heard a real reason?

Read on.

Blogged for thee by @ 7:49 am | 0 Comments | Post a Comment | Link Love? |

0 Noble Readers have commented.


zigzackly's omnium-gatherum *
Quid quid latine dictum sit, altum videtur
Reactions, suggestions, any kind of feedback is always welcome. Recent Posts More fool, us. spel it lyk it is From the desk of Massah Gates Before you go register your URL Destined to be the most popular blogtoon in the 's... Rock and a Ha Ha Place Going legal Love, Groucho It's contextual If there's nothing else you read today.. D Mervin Ffingir writes, and having writ, moves on: September 2003 \| December 2003 \| January 2004 \| February 2004 \| March 2004 \| April 2004 \| May 2004 \| June 2004 \| July 2004 \| August 2004 \| September 2004 \| October 2004 \| November 2004 \| December 2004 \| January 2005 \| February 2005 \| March 2005 \| April 2005 \| May 2005 \| June 2005 \| July 2005 \| August 2005 \| September 2005 \| October 2005 \| November 2005 \| December 2005 \| January 2006 \| February 2006 \| March 2006 \| April 2006 \| May 2006 \| June 2006 \| July 2006 \| August 2006 \| September 2006 \| October 2006 \| November 2006 \| December 2006 \| January 2007 \| February 2007 \| March 2007 \| April 2007 \| May 2007 \| June 2007 \| July 2007 \| August 2007 \| September 2007 \| October 2007 \| November 2007 \| December 2007 \| January 2008 \| February 2008 \| March 2008 \| April 2008 \| May 2008 \| June 2008 \| July 2008 \| August 2008 \| November 2008 \| December 2008 \| January 2009 \| March 2009 \| April 2009 \| May 2009 \| June 2009 \| July 2009 \| August 2009 \| September 2009 \| November 2009 \| December 2009 \| January 2010 \| February 2010 \| March 2010 \| June 2010 \| July 2010 \| August 2010 \| October 2010 \| November 2010 \| December 2010 \| January 2011 \| February 2011 \| March 2011 \| April 2011 \| May 2011 \| August 2011 \| September 2011 \| December 2011 \| February 2012 \| March 2012 \| August 2012 \| December 2012 \| April 2013 \|	Thursday, April 06, 2006 In which we show restraint on the post tit le. BoingBoing prints this letter from Bennett Haselton, founder of Peacefire, about the FCC's ludicrous decision to issue a fine for the incident that gave us the term "wardrobe malfunction" two years ago: I usually don't send out pure opinion pieces, but let it be said: There is not one person anywhere who can give you a good reason why it's OK to show a man's chest on TV, but not a woman's chest. You can ask over 100 people why -- trust me, I have -- and not get a real answer. It's just a silly superstition that some people came up with, a bunch of others went along with it, and now we're stuck with it. Have you ever heard a real reason? Read on. Blogged for thee by @ 7:49 am \| 0 Comments \| Post a Comment \| Link Love? \| 0 Noble Readers have commented. Post a Comment Kind souls who have linked to this post include: <$BlogBacklinkAuthor$> on <$BlogBacklinkTitle$> @ <$BlogBacklinkDateTime$>: <$BlogBacklinkSnippet$> Create a Link < < Home < <	Note: [*] = The site linked to requires registration. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License. Follow this blog